|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Rounded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2001 | 445 | 443 | 445 | 448 | 451 | 457 | 463 | 466 | 465 | 468 | 472 | 469 | 458 |
| 2002 | 467 | 466 | 468 | 469 | 472 | 476 | 481 | 484 | 485 | 487 | 489 | 484 | 477 |
| 2003 | 483 | 484 | 487 | 493 | 494 | 497 | 501 | 499 | 499 | 503 | 504 | 502 | 496 |
| 2004 |
504 | 504 | 504 | 504 | 508 | 512 | 517 | 522 | 523 | 526 | 525 | 521 |
514 |
| 2005 |
526 |
525 |
525 |
529 |
527 |
529 |
538 |
540 |
542 |
548 |
553 |
550 |
536 |
| 2006 |
551 |
551 |
551 |
557 |
560 |
570 |
574 |
574 |
579 |
588 |
588 |
588 |
569 |
| 2007 |
588 |
593 |
588 |
593 |
597 |
602 |
611 |
616 |
616 |
620 |
620 |
620 |
606 |
| 2008 |
620 |
625 |
634 |
639 |
644 |
648 |
662 |
671 |
676 |
685 |
685 | 681 |
656 |
| 2009 |
685 |
685 | 685 | 695 |
699 |
708 |
741 |
750 |
755 |
764 |
778 |
782 |
727 |
| 2010 |
796 |
787 |
787 | 787 | 796 | 806 | 824 | ||||||
| BACK (Index with Base 1960) |
Roy's Home Page |
CyberJournalist
Resources for Journalists |
Trade links Government of India links |
| Quarterly averages of Index with Base 1960
(multiply with link factor 4.93 and round off) is to be used for
calculation of dearness allowance under Manisana
Wage Board Awards. The Labour Bureau has announced new series AICPI for industrial workers with base 2001. The index numbers from 2006 are obtained by multiplying it with the link factor of 4.63 Original values can be seen by placing the pointer above the figures. |
1. All India Consumer Price Index Number for Industrial Workers (CPI-IW) on base 2001=100 for July 2010 increased by 4 points and stood at 178 (one hundred and seventy eight).
2. During July 2010, the index recorded an increase of 11 points each in Bhavnagar and Giridih centres, 10 points each in Ranchi Hatia, Chandigarh and Amritsar centres, 9 points in 2 centres, 8 points in 2 centres, 7 points in 5 centres, 6 points in 9 centres, 5 points in 11 centres, 4 points in 11 centres, 3 points in 11 centres, 2 points in 5 centres and 1 point in 9 centres. The index decreased by 2 points each in Coimbatore and Warrangal centres and 1 point in Salem centre, while in the remaining 5 centres the index remained stationary.
3. The maximum increase of 11 points in Bhavnagar centre was mainly on account of Housing Index and increase in the prices of Groundnut Oil, Milk, Vegetable & Fruit items etc. The increase of 11 points in Giridih centre was due to Housing Index and increase in the prices of Rice, Vegetable & Fruit items, Soft Coke, etc. The increase of 10 points each in Ranchi Hatia, Chandigarh and Amritsar centres was mainly on account of Housing Index and increase in the prices of Rice, Wheat Atta, Onion, Vegetable & Fruit items, Kerosene Oil, Cooking Gas, etc. However, the decrease of 2 points in Coimbatore and Warrangal centres was due to decrease in the prices of Rice, Vegetable items etc. and the decrease of 1 point in Salem centre was due to decrease in the prices of Rice, Vegetable items, etc.
4. The indices in respect of the six major centres are as follows :
1. Ahmedabad
175
4. Delhi
164
2. Bangalore
183
5. Kolkata
175
3. Chennai
162
6. Mumbai
175
5. The point to point rate of inflation in July 2010 was 11.25% as compared to 13.73% in June 2010.